Subject: Re: [boost] Call for Review: Boost.Test documentation rewrite
From: pfultz2 (pfultz2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-01-10 13:25:20
> To me, this feels kinda backwards. You've implemented something
without explaining it to anyone first or getting their feedback on the
design. We have no idea whether or not it will be an improvement over
the existing library or whether or not anyone will even like it and
want to use it.
He did discuss the new features with the mailing list, and even presented
it for a min-review:
-- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Call-for-Review-Boost-Test-documentation-rewrite-tp4657283p4657604.html Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk