Subject: Re: [boost] Final opinion on Re: Boost.Fiber review January 6-15
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-01-12 11:43:03
On 11 Jan 2014 at 17:29, Oliver Kowalke wrote:
> but I'm uncertain which one (at least if already added support for
> interruption) - but what
> about the others (many of them a conditionally compiled)?
Me personally I am very cool about (existing) interruption support. I
think thread interruption really ought to be part of an improved,
more generic C++ exception handling mechanism, and not bolted on top
by user code.
In other words, thread interuption in my opinion really ought to be
supported directly by the C++ runtime. But that's another discussion
you can read about on the ISO study groups (if you're really bored).
> > * Intel TSX support to avoid locks.
> may I contact you for some info regarding to this issue (I'd like to
> benefit from your knowledge)?
Of course! Though I fear I have little knowledge to share, except
that of how ignorant I am.
-- Currently unemployed and looking for work. Work Portfolio: http://careers.stackoverflow.com/nialldouglas/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk