Subject: Re: [boost] [Boost-users] Boost.Compute v0.1 Released
From: Kyle Lutz (kyle.r.lutz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-03-17 11:29:27
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Rhys Ulerich <rhys.ulerich_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Kyle Lutz <kyle.r.lutz_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Boost.Compute is a GPGPU and parallel-programming library based on
>> OpenCL. It provides an STL-like API and implements many common
>> containers (e.g. vector<T>, array<T, N>) as well as many common
>> algorithms (e.g. sort(), accumulate(), transform()). A full list can
>> be found in the header reference .
> Besides the OpenGL niceness and STLishness, is there a reason to
> prefer Boost.Compute over alternatives targeted at OpenCL/CUDA
> numerics? There's already been much work in this space ,
> including VexCL  which many of my collaborators like. While there
> is an answer in the FAQ , it seems dodgy as clearly VexCL could not
> presently be built on Boost.Compute since the latter does not support
> for CUDA while the former does.
Good point. That FAQ entry was written before VexCL added its CUDA
back-end (which occurred relatively recently). Boost.Compute and VexCL
have different aims and scopes. Boost.Compute is more similar to the
C++ STL while VexCL is more similar to a linear algebra library like
Eigen. Also see this StackOverflow question  entitled "Differences
between VexCL, Thrust, and Boost.Compute".
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk