Subject: Re: [boost] Is Boost dead? [Re: Anyone is interested in being review manager of Application?]
From: Sohail Somani (sohail_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-16 20:15:32
On 16/05/2014 7:21 PM, Adam Wulkiewicz wrote:
> Sohail Somani wrote:
>> Moving to git was a smart decision but my personal experience has
>> shown that the current configuration does not encourage forking in a
>> way that makes it easy to contribute.
>> Would anyone know what the rate of incoming patches from outside
>> developers has been since the change? That would be an easy way to
>> tell if it's just me being lazy (probably is).
> I don't understand all of those negative voices. Especially I don't
> understand how contributing can be considered difficult or harder than
> I'm a contributor at Boost.Geometry and you can believe me or not but
> getting involved in the Boost library development was never easier than
> it is now. In Geometry we already have > 30 pull requests closed. On
> GitHub you can fork one library with one button click, make a change and
> create a pull request (with 2 button clicks and writing a message).
> Reviewing the code is extremely simple, you can discuss about the code
> or make comments about single lines. And working with GIT is a real
> pleasure WRT the SVN. But you even don't need to know how to use GIT
> since the changes can be made directly on GitHub or you can use their
> app on Windows to handle local repos. We have really great tools at hand
> so we should use them.
Obviously Git is better to use than SVN for Boost, there is no argument
Your 30+ pull requests look like they're mostly from the same guy.
That's fine, but not a good enough example of how much easier it has
become to contribute. Time will tell. It's interesting that you're
suggesting a Github-based workflow that wouldn't even require a local
repo. That could be worth a shot next time. How would I maintain my own
personal fork for my projects until the pull request was accepted?
Thanks for your viewpoint.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk