Re: [boost] Foundational vs non-foundational libraries

Subject: Re: [boost] Foundational vs non-foundational libraries
From: Bjorn Reese (breese_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-21 12:05:47

On 05/21/2014 05:39 PM, Michael Caisse wrote:

> I'm not certain which population you are using for consensus. The
> barriers of getting a C++11 only library into Boost are currently the
> difficulties raised by Robert Ramey in the "Thoughts of Boost v2" branch
> of this thread. Another barrier is the submission of a C++11 only library.

Robert's mails do not appear on the mailing-list (I suspect that you
have read them via a gateway for the mailing-list rather than the
mailing-list itself.) Can somebody please forward or summarize them
here?