Subject: Re: [boost] [ANN] libstudxml - modern XML API for C++
From: Eric Niebler (eniebler_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-21 11:57:40
On 05/21/2014 08:15 AM, Stefan Seefeld wrote:
> I have also argued that re-implementing all that functionality from
> scratch is foolish with so many existing implementations, so any
> boost.xml project should focus on wrapping such implementations, rather
> than reinventing them. In fact, I believe such an API should be robust
> enough to be able to wrap different backends, rather than depending on a
> particular implementation choice.
I personally like the idea of having a small, fast, lightweight XML
parser with no external dependencies under the Boost Software License.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk