Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: [boost] [optional] Top level bad_optional_access.hpp
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-31 03:54:59


I've noticed a new top-level header boost/bad_optional_access.hpp. It wasn't
present in 1.55, so it is a recent development. AFAIK, top level headers are
discouraged, all library specific headers, except the "include all" header,
should be inside the library directory. Am I correct?

If so, could this header be moved inside boost/optional?

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at