Re: [boost] [optional] Top level bad_optional_access.hpp

Subject: Re: [boost] [optional] Top level bad_optional_access.hpp
From: Andrzej Krzemienski (akrzemi1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-31 07:57:11

2014-05-31 9:54 GMT+02:00 Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]>:

> Hi,
>
> I've noticed a new top-level header boost/bad_optional_access.hpp. It
> wasn't
> present in 1.55, so it is a recent development. AFAIK, top level headers
> are
> discouraged, all library specific headers, except the "include all" header,
> should be inside the library directory. Am I correct?
>
> If so, could this header be moved inside boost/optional?
>

I agree. And to my knowledge it is in boost/optional/. Are you looking at
the head of develop branch? (I think at some point in the past I
incorrectly put it directly into boost, but it has been fixed since.)

Regards,
&rzej