Subject: [boost] [optional] Is detail/none_t.hpp needed?
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-31 04:01:57
I've noticed there's boost/detail/none_t.hpp header, which basically reflects
boost/none_t.hpp. Worse even, it would cause a conflict if both these headers
are included. A search didn't reveal any users of this header. Since it's a
detail, could this header be removed?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk