Subject: Re: [boost] [optional] Is detail/none_t.hpp needed?
From: Andrzej Krzemienski (akrzemi1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-31 07:59:40
2014-05-31 10:01 GMT+02:00 Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]>:
> I've noticed there's boost/detail/none_t.hpp header, which basically
> boost/none_t.hpp. Worse even, it would cause a conflict if both these
> are included. A search didn't reveal any users of this header. Since it's a
> detail, could this header be removed?
I noted your suggestion. I need a couple of days to investigate.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk