Subject: Re: [boost] throw or boost::throw_exception?
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-31 07:58:14
On Saturday 31 May 2014 14:50:08 Peter Dimov wrote:
> John Maddock wrote:
> > The rationale is that boost/throw_exception.hpp started off at least as a
> > workaround for compilers with exception handling turned off (and is still
> > required for such), the fact that it pulls in one header from
> > Boost.Exception as well is a side effect, but a not-unhappy one in that it
> > stops endless "why do I need to depend on Boost.Exception" discussions, if
> > that one header shift to Config.
> Or, we could move these two headers to a separate 'throw_exception' module,
> with Emil as maintainer.
Boost.ExceptionCore? Yes, I like that too.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk