Subject: Re: [boost] [optional] Top level bad_optional_access.hpp
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-31 08:47:09
On Saturday 31 May 2014 13:57:11 Andrzej Krzemienski wrote:
> 2014-05-31 9:54 GMT+02:00 Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]>:
> > Hi,
> > I've noticed a new top-level header boost/bad_optional_access.hpp. It
> > wasn't
> > present in 1.55, so it is a recent development. AFAIK, top level headers
> > are
> > discouraged, all library specific headers, except the "include all"
> > header,
> > should be inside the library directory. Am I correct?
> > If so, could this header be moved inside boost/optional?
> I agree. And to my knowledge it is in boost/optional/. Are you looking at
> the head of develop branch? (I think at some point in the past I
> incorrectly put it directly into boost, but it has been fixed since.)
Oh, right. I've updated the local copy and it's in boost/optional now. Sorry
for the noise.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk