Re: [boost] [optional] Is detail/none_t.hpp needed?

Subject: Re: [boost] [optional] Is detail/none_t.hpp needed?
From: Andrzej Krzemienski (akrzemi1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-03 12:04:03

2014-05-31 13:59 GMT+02:00 Andrzej Krzemienski <akrzemi1_at_[hidden]>:

>
>
>
> 2014-05-31 10:01 GMT+02:00 Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]>:
>
> Hi,
>>
>> I've noticed there's boost/detail/none_t.hpp header, which basically
>> reflects
>> boost/none_t.hpp. Worse even, it would cause a conflict if both these
>> headers
>> are included. A search didn't reveal any users of this header. Since it's
>> a
>> detail, could this header be removed?
>>
>
> I noted your suggestion. I need a couple of days to investigate.
>

It is now removed in 'develop'. Even optional wasn't using it.

Regards,
&rzej