Subject: Re: [boost] [optional] Is detail/none_t.hpp needed?
From: Andrzej Krzemienski (akrzemi1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-03 12:04:03
2014-05-31 13:59 GMT+02:00 Andrzej Krzemienski <akrzemi1_at_[hidden]>:
> 2014-05-31 10:01 GMT+02:00 Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]>:
>> I've noticed there's boost/detail/none_t.hpp header, which basically
>> boost/none_t.hpp. Worse even, it would cause a conflict if both these
>> are included. A search didn't reveal any users of this header. Since it's
>> detail, could this header be removed?
> I noted your suggestion. I need a couple of days to investigate.
It is now removed in 'develop'. Even optional wasn't using it.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk