Re: [boost] [optional] Is detail/none_t.hpp needed?

Subject: Re: [boost] [optional] Is detail/none_t.hpp needed?
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-03 12:05:56

On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Andrzej Krzemienski <akrzemi1_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> 2014-05-31 13:59 GMT+02:00 Andrzej Krzemienski <akrzemi1_at_[hidden]>:
>> 2014-05-31 10:01 GMT+02:00 Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]>:
>>
>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've noticed there's boost/detail/none_t.hpp header, which basically
>>> reflects
>>> boost/none_t.hpp. Worse even, it would cause a conflict if both these
>>> headers
>>> are included. A search didn't reveal any users of this header. Since it's
>>> a
>>> detail, could this header be removed?
>>>
>>
>> I noted your suggestion. I need a couple of days to investigate.
>>
>
> It is now removed in 'develop'. Even optional wasn't using it.

Great, thanks.

Will it be in 1.56? And the fix for gcc 4.4 move in C++11 mode?