Re: [boost] [optional] Is detail/none_t.hpp needed?

Subject: Re: [boost] [optional] Is detail/none_t.hpp needed?
From: Andrzej Krzemienski (akrzemi1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-03 13:00:52

2014-06-03 18:05 GMT+02:00 Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]>:

> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Andrzej Krzemienski <akrzemi1_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
> > 2014-05-31 13:59 GMT+02:00 Andrzej Krzemienski <akrzemi1_at_[hidden]>:
> >> 2014-05-31 10:01 GMT+02:00 Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]>:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I've noticed there's boost/detail/none_t.hpp header, which basically
> >>> reflects
> >>> boost/none_t.hpp. Worse even, it would cause a conflict if both these
> >>> headers
> >>> are included. A search didn't reveal any users of this header. Since
> it's
> >>> a
> >>> detail, could this header be removed?
> >>>
> >>
> >> I noted your suggestion. I need a couple of days to investigate.
> >>
> >
> > It is now removed in 'develop'. Even optional wasn't using it.
>
> Great, thanks.
>
> Will it be in 1.56? And the fix for gcc 4.4 move in C++11 mode?
>
> yes and yes -- this is my plan.

&rzej