Re: [boost] [optional] Is detail/none_t.hpp needed?

Subject: Re: [boost] [optional] Is detail/none_t.hpp needed?
From: Andrzej Krzemienski (akrzemi1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-06 07:22:55

2014-06-03 19:00 GMT+02:00 Andrzej Krzemienski <akrzemi1_at_[hidden]>:

>
>
>
> 2014-06-03 18:05 GMT+02:00 Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]>:
>
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Andrzej Krzemienski <akrzemi1_at_[hidden]>
>> wrote:
>> > 2014-05-31 13:59 GMT+02:00 Andrzej Krzemienski <akrzemi1_at_[hidden]>:
>> >> 2014-05-31 10:01 GMT+02:00 Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]
>> >:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>> I've noticed there's boost/detail/none_t.hpp header, which basically
>> >>> reflects
>> >>> boost/none_t.hpp. Worse even, it would cause a conflict if both these
>> >>> headers
>> >>> are included. A search didn't reveal any users of this header. Since
>> it's
>> >>> a
>> >>> detail, could this header be removed?
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> I noted your suggestion. I need a couple of days to investigate.
>> >>
>> >
>> > It is now removed in 'develop'. Even optional wasn't using it.
>>
>> Great, thanks.
>>
>> Will it be in 1.56? And the fix for gcc 4.4 move in C++11 mode?
>>
>> yes and yes -- this is my plan.
>
> The changes are in master now.
&rzej