Subject: Re: [boost] [spinlock] concurrent_unordered_map is ready for review
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-09-02 13:32:09
Niall Douglas wrote
> On 1 Sep 2014 at 15:41, Edward Diener wrote:
>> >> Do you intend this to be a separate library, or would it go into
>> >> like Boost.Container?
>> > Not sure yet. My next goal is no-alloc promise-future, also based on
>> > spinlocks.
>> > I don't intend to "finish" concurrent_unordered_map past what is
>> > already done, and I suspect no Boost library will accept it until I
>> > or someone else does.
> I hope a GSoC student finishes it in 2015 or 2016, but for me it's
> enough for me to move on, so I am. You will hear what I will be doing
> next later today in fact.
What do you mean by "ready for review" exactly?
-- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/spinlock-concurrent-unordered-map-is-ready-for-review-tp4667136p4667199.html Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk