Subject: Re: [boost] [spinlock] concurrent_unordered_map is ready for review
From: Glen Fernandes (glen.fernandes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-09-02 16:10:20
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Robert Ramey wrote:
> What do you mean by "ready for review" exactly?
While the thread subject [now] confuses me also: Was the motivation
for the thread to find someone who is interested in improving this
concurrent_unordered_map implementation such that it would be accepted
into some Boost library?