Subject: Re: [boost] Finite state machine
From: Michael Caisse (mcaisse-lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-09-07 01:28:33
On 09/06/2014 03:20 AM, arcolight wrote:
> Hi all.
> I have a question about participation in boost libraries. In my embedded
> project I'm using finite state machine and I tried to use one of the
> boost implementations of FSM, but they are too big and complex. Main
> disadvantage of them is usage of dynamic memory allocation, that I can't
> afford on my CPU and many dependencies, that I can't use on my CPU. CPU
> is ARM Cortex-M4 with 128K memory, I've no operating system in my project.
> I have write my own FSM implementation without dynamic memory and
> dependencies, it's more simple, than boost libraries, but, of course,
> not so powerful.
> I've used C++11 standard, specifically variadic templates. My question -
> Is there some interest in such FSM implementation for boost developers?
> I'll be very grateful for advice.
> P.S.: I'm sorry for my english, it's not my native language.
Are you using Statechart or MSM?
-- Michael Caisse ciere consulting ciere.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk