Subject: Re: [boost] [review] [sort] Sort library review manager results
From: Steven Ross (spreadsort_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-11-27 09:22:36
I made changes to the documentation in the develop branch during the review
to deal with concerns raised by reviewers. I will also improve the
specific documentation Edward suggested with regards to situations where
spreadsort vs std::sort are faster relative to each other, and provide
explanations and examples of how to use it for more complicated multiple
key sorts and such.
Specific suggestions on how to improve the documentation are welcome.
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014, 8:47 AM Mathias Gaunard <mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden]>
> On 27/11/14 02:32, Edward Diener wrote:
> > Review Result:
> > Based on the voting for acceptance or not, based on the discussions
> > during the review period, and based on Steven Ross's responses, I have
> > decided that Steven Ross's library should be accepted into Boost.
> I did not really participate in the review, but I did notice there was
> consensus that the documentation was not really satisfactory.
> Was this issue already addressed during the review or will it be
> addressed during the integration period?
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk