Subject: Re: [boost] [type_traits] Rewrite and dependency free version
From: Stephen Kelly (hello_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-02-03 18:43:09
Robert Ramey wrote:
> I can say What I believe we want to move toward is the ability for users
> deploy a useful subset of boost in order to support his applications. I
> think that's unreasonable or controversial.
Then tell us the user-story. Does the user download a tarball or not? What's
the rest of the story?
> I've made a more concrete proposal. I believe that some variation of this
> could be made to work. I think it addresses the real problems that users
What if you are completely wrong and out of touch? What if your concept of
modularity is completely wrong? What if you should educate yourself about
modules, but you don't?
> There is just no way simply "splitting a library" is going to
> really address anything and move us forward.
It's a pre-rejected idea, as I said.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk