Subject: Re: [boost] To split, or not to split, or something else? RE: type_traits rewrite, modularization, dependencies, etc.
From: Stephen Kelly (hello_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-02-03 18:44:02
Neil Groves wrote:
> I also understand that the direction of C++ modules makes it appear that
> it would be prudent to solve these dependencies in another manner, so that
> we are ready to adopt them rather than being forced to start the
> deprecation process very later and delay the adoption of modules. We can't
> be sure we are exactly correct, but the general direction for modules is
> clear enough to motivate action now.
> Please feel free to enlist my help.
You might want to tell Robert that.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk