Subject: Re: [boost] [Hana] Informal review request
From: pfultz2 (pfultz2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-03-08 15:56:11
> This might sound discouraging, but I consider any library that doesn't
> work fully with GCC 4.9, Clang 3.5 and MSVC14, which are already
> bleeding-edge compilers, to not be suitable for real use
Its important to support more than one compiler, but, I think, it is
acceptable if it doesn't support bug-ridden compilers such as MSVC. Boost is
about pushing innovation in C++, and we can't let a compiler that is over
a decade behind the rest of the industry hold back that innovation.
-- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Hana-Informal-review-request-tp4672703p4672848.html Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk