Subject: Re: [boost] Interest in non-intrusive signal/slot lib?
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-12 11:49:33
On 5/11/2015 10:25 PM, Emil Dotchevski wrote:
> I realize that Boost has Signals library already, but I've implemented a
> non-intrusive one which approaches the problem differently, and I'm pretty
> sure that there is no overlap between the two. It turned out more generic
> than I originally anticipated, so I thought I'd ask if others would find it
> useful as well.
What do you mean by non-intrusive versus the signals2 library ?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk