Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Deprecation Policy
From: Rob Stewart (rob.stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-16 21:36:10


On May 16, 2015 6:54:38 PM EDT, "charleyb123 ." <charleyb123_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> > Rob sayeth:
>
> <snip, deprecation policy, modular-or-monolithic distribution>,
>
> Stefan respondeth:
>
> > I imagine it's entirety possible to produce a "boost release" (or
> "distro"
> > to use a term Niall suggested) consisting of all the latest releases
> of
> > individual boost libraries.
>
> This is a very interesting idea: The concept of a "Distribution".
>
> I could see something like:
>
> (a)- Boost "Networking/IPC" distribution
>
> (b)- Boost "Embedded" distribution (supporting Beaglebone or specific
> platform)
>
> (c)- Boost "Template Meta-Programming" distribution (requires C++14)
>
> (d)- Boost "Everything" Distribution (what we have now)
>
> (e)- etc.

Whether that has merit is a separate matter. (Note that such an idea will only ever come to fruition if someone does the work.)

___
Rob

(Sent from my portable computation engine)


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk