Subject: Re: [boost] Deprecation Policy
From: Rob Stewart (rob.stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-16 21:36:10
On May 16, 2015 6:54:38 PM EDT, "charleyb123 ." <charleyb123_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > Rob sayeth:
> <snip, deprecation policy, modular-or-monolithic distribution>,
> Stefan respondeth:
> > I imagine it's entirety possible to produce a "boost release" (or
> > to use a term Niall suggested) consisting of all the latest releases
> > individual boost libraries.
> This is a very interesting idea: The concept of a "Distribution".
> I could see something like:
> (a)- Boost "Networking/IPC" distribution
> (b)- Boost "Embedded" distribution (supporting Beaglebone or specific
> (c)- Boost "Template Meta-Programming" distribution (requires C++14)
> (d)- Boost "Everything" Distribution (what we have now)
> (e)- etc.
Whether that has merit is a separate matter. (Note that such an idea will only ever come to fruition if someone does the work.)
(Sent from my portable computation engine)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk