Re: [boost] Interest in non-intrusive signal/slot lib?

Subject: Re: [boost] Interest in non-intrusive signal/slot lib?
From: Ahmed Charles (acharles_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-17 16:15:10

> On May 11, 2015, at 7:26 PM, Emil Dotchevski <emildotchevski_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I realize that Boost has Signals library already, but I've implemented a
> non-intrusive one which approaches the problem differently, and I'm pretty
> sure that there is no overlap between the two. It turned out more generic
> than I originally anticipated, so I thought I'd ask if others would find it
> useful as well.
> 
> Specifically I was motivated by wanting to use Qt without MOCing. I asked
> the Qt community if that was possible which generated several rather
> annoyed negative responses.

Have you looked at CopperSpice? It's basically Qt 4.8 but in C++11 and without MOC.

It's also probably the reason for the negative responses on the list, but who knows.