Subject: Re: [boost] Interest in non-intrusive signal/slot lib?
From: Ahmed Charles (acharles_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-17 16:15:10
> On May 11, 2015, at 7:26 PM, Emil Dotchevski <emildotchevski_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I realize that Boost has Signals library already, but I've implemented a
> non-intrusive one which approaches the problem differently, and I'm pretty
> sure that there is no overlap between the two. It turned out more generic
> than I originally anticipated, so I thought I'd ask if others would find it
> useful as well.
> Specifically I was motivated by wanting to use Qt without MOCing. I asked
> the Qt community if that was possible which generated several rather
> annoyed negative responses.
Have you looked at CopperSpice? It's basically Qt 4.8 but in C++11 and without MOC.
It's also probably the reason for the negative responses on the list, but who knows.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk