Re: [boost] Interest in non-intrusive signal/slot lib?

Subject: Re: [boost] Interest in non-intrusive signal/slot lib?
From: Emil Dotchevski (emildotchevski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-18 15:52:25

On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Ahmed Charles <acharles_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>
> > On May 11, 2015, at 7:26 PM, Emil Dotchevski <emildotchevski_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I realize that Boost has Signals library already, but I've implemented a
> > non-intrusive one which approaches the problem differently, and I'm
> pretty
> > sure that there is no overlap between the two. It turned out more generic
> > than I originally anticipated, so I thought I'd ask if others would find
> it
> > useful as well.
> >
> > Specifically I was motivated by wanting to use Qt without MOCing. I asked
> > the Qt community if that was possible which generated several rather
> > annoyed negative responses.
>
> Have you looked at CopperSpice? It's basically Qt 4.8 but in C++11 and
> without MOC.
>

Perhaps I shouldn't have emphasized that Synapse makes it possible to add
custom Qt signals without mocing and without having to derive from their
types. Synapse is not about Qt, it's much more generic.

-- 
Emil Dotchevski
Reverge Studios, Inc.
http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode