Re: [boost] Interest in non-intrusive signal/slot lib?

Subject: Re: [boost] Interest in non-intrusive signal/slot lib?
From: Emil Dotchevski (emildotchevski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-18 15:44:40

On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Stephen Kelly <hello_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Emil Dotchevski wrote:
>
> > Specifically I was motivated by wanting to use Qt without MOCing. I asked
> > the Qt community if that was possible which generated several rather
> > annoyed negative responses. :)
>
> You don't get to make belittling claims like that unless you link to it.
>
> I searched the correct place and found nothing from you:
>
>
> http://search.gmane.org/search.php?group=gmane.comp.lib.qt.devel&query=Dotchevski+
>

I didn't post there, I asked on their IRC channel. I don't know if that's
archived somewhere. People there were actually very helpful in getting me
up and running with Qt, but in my experience the no-mocing thing is a hot
button issue, and probably for good reasons.

-- 
Emil Dotchevski
Reverge Studios, Inc.
http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode