Subject: Re: [boost] Questions about upcoming review of Boost.AFIO
From: Michael Caisse (mcaisse-lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-20 13:13:53
On 05/20/2015 09:56 AM, Niall Douglas wrote:
> Dear list,
> 2. AFIO requires APIBind which is a separate library. APIBind is not
> yet in the review queue and it is pending me writing up its
> documentation and a more useful unit test suite. Is this a problem?
> Do note that you the user of AFIO will never need to know about
> APIBind, it is entirely an internal implementation detail.
This is not a problem. It simply gets treated as an implementation
detail of the AFIO library under review. There is precedence for this
type of thing in which sometimes a useful detail becomes a stand-alone
library (after an independent review) at a later time.
We have also seen in the past that an implementation detail is too
clever or deemed unnecessary by the community. That causes the review to
bog down in territory that is not salient to the library core; however,
must be resolved.
-- Michael Caisse ciere consulting ciere.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk