Re: [boost] [metaparse] Update review

Subject: Re: [boost] [metaparse] Update review
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-06-04 05:30:56

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boost [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Rob Stewart
> Sent: 04 June 2015 09:58
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] [metaparse] Update review
> 
> On June 4, 2015 1:30:28 AM EDT, Abel Sinkovics <abel_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> > On 2015-06-04 06:45, Edward Diener wrote:
> > >
> > > A couple of quibbles about the design based merely on my own sense
> > of
> > > 'naming'. Since I have roundly criticized "naming wars" <g> in the
> > > past I no doubt leave myself open for criticism, but these are just
> > > personal suggestions, which I can live without:

BOOST_METAPARSE_STRING 

gets my vote, FWIW.

Paul