Subject: Re: [boost] [http] Formal review of Boost.Http
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-08-17 04:18:13
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boost [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Rob Stewart
> Sent: 13 August 2015 00:09
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] [http] Formal review of Boost.Http
> On August 12, 2015 11:27:09 AM EDT, Niall Douglas <s_sourceforge_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > On 12 Aug 2015 at 9:49, AgustÃn K-ballo BergÃ© wrote:
> > > > The very first sentence makes it very clear it is not a Boost
> > > > blessed document.
> > >
> > > I'm happy with the newly added note claiming that those are your
> > > opinions and yours only. That way others won't feel the need to
> > clarify
> > > that's not a Boost thing every single time you mention it.
> I think everyone is reasonably happy on this point. Let's call a moratorium on it.
And even more constructively, let's have more contributions (possibly with differing views) to this and other documents on Trac (for want of somewhere better to put them).
--- Paul A. Bristow Prizet Farmhouse Kendal UK LA8 8AB +44 (0) 1539 561830
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk