Re: [boost] [http] Formal review of Boost.Http

Subject: Re: [boost] [http] Formal review of Boost.Http
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-08-17 04:18:13

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boost [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Rob Stewart
> Sent: 13 August 2015 00:09
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] [http] Formal review of Boost.Http
> 
> On August 12, 2015 11:27:09 AM EDT, Niall Douglas <s_sourceforge_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > On 12 Aug 2015 at 9:49, Agustín K-ballo Bergé wrote:
> >
> > > > The very first sentence makes it very clear it is not a Boost
> > > > blessed document.
> > >
> > > I'm happy with the newly added note claiming that those are your
> > > opinions and yours only. That way others won't feel the need to
> > clarify
> > > that's not a Boost thing every single time you mention it.
> 
> I think everyone is reasonably happy on this point. Let's call a moratorium on it.

+1

And even more constructively, let's have more contributions (possibly with differing views) to this and other documents on Trac (for want of somewhere better to put them).

Paul

---
Paul A. Bristow
Prizet Farmhouse
Kendal UK LA8 8AB
[phone]