Subject: Re: [boost] [iterator] Regenerating the iterator docs
From: Glen Fernandes (glen.fernandes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-08-26 08:15:24
> The long-term answer is to convert the information in RST format to
> Doxygen-syntax comments in the actual code.
Do we plan to support RST based generators like Sphinx in the future?
(I don't even know if Quickbook is under any active development. Is it?)
-- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/iterator-Regenerating-the-iterator-docs-tp4679186p4679295.html Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk