Re: [boost] [iterator] Regenerating the iterator docs

Subject: Re: [boost] [iterator] Regenerating the iterator docs
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-08-26 08:45:29

On 8/26/2015 8:15 AM, Glen Fernandes wrote:
> Paul wrote:
>> The long-term answer is to convert the information in RST format to
>> Doxygen-syntax comments in the actual code.
>
> Do we plan to support RST based generators like Sphinx in the future?
> (I don't even know if Quickbook is under any active development. Is it?)

I think Quickbook is pretty good and it is a part of Boost. I also think 
it is under active development.