Re: [boost] [iterator] Regenerating the iterator docs

Subject: Re: [boost] [iterator] Regenerating the iterator docs
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-08-26 11:45:29

On 8/26/15 5:45 AM, Edward Diener wrote:
> On 8/26/2015 8:15 AM, Glen Fernandes wrote:
>> Paul wrote:
>>> The long-term answer is to convert the information in RST format to
>>> Doxygen-syntax comments in the actual code.
>>
>> Do we plan to support RST based generators like Sphinx in the future?
>> (I don't even know if Quickbook is under any active development. Is it?)
>
> I think Quickbook is pretty good and it is a part of Boost. I also think
> it is under active development.

Long standing boost policy is to require HTML files.  How they are 
generated has been according to the preference the author - or I guess 
the maintainer.  Unless we want to change this policy - I guess there's 
not a lot to discuss.

Robert Ramey