Subject: Re: [boost] [iterator] Regenerating the iterator docs
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-08-26 11:45:29
On 8/26/15 5:45 AM, Edward Diener wrote:
> On 8/26/2015 8:15 AM, Glen Fernandes wrote:
>> Paul wrote:
>>> The long-term answer is to convert the information in RST format to
>>> Doxygen-syntax comments in the actual code.
>> Do we plan to support RST based generators like Sphinx in the future?
>> (I don't even know if Quickbook is under any active development. Is it?)
> I think Quickbook is pretty good and it is a part of Boost. I also think
> it is under active development.
Long standing boost policy is to require HTML files. How they are
generated has been according to the preference the author - or I guess
the maintainer. Unless we want to change this policy - I guess there's
not a lot to discuss.