Subject: Re: [boost] [Boost-users] [afio] Formal review of Boost.AFIO
From: Roland Bock (rbock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-08-27 04:31:44
On 2015-08-27 09:23, Darren Cook wrote:
>> ... And because I do not have unlimited time on my hand, I simply
>> cannot invest the time to find fundamental flaws.
> This is an incredible important point. If the documentation does not
> allow us to *easily* understand the design and use cases it should be
> rejected. Because it may be bad, we just cannot tell.
> Have now followed a couple of reviews, it seems any largish library
> needs more than one team member, with different skills. Niall's last
> message is basically saying he wants a boost review not to rubber-stamp
> the library for acceptance, but to get some feedback. I.e. to use the
> boost brain power as a temporary team.
And I would be totally fine with that if that intention was explicit,
i.e. stop the official review, ask for feedback.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk