Subject: Re: [boost] Interest in a Boost.Chrono/Date library
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-11-01 13:16:23
On Sunday, November 01, 2015 07:08:17 PM Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
> Hi again,
> from the number of replays to this post and the number of informal
> review received I deduce that there is not enough interest in this library.
> Maybe next time will be a better :)
I think the interest is there, but the licensing issue makes this particular
implementation much less appealing.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk