Re: [boost] Interest in a Boost.Chrono/Date library

Subject: Re: [boost] Interest in a Boost.Chrono/Date library
From: Vicente J. Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-11-01 13:08:17

Hi again,

from the number of replays to this post and the number of informal 
review received I deduce that there is not enough interest in this library.

Maybe next time will be a better :)

Best,
Vicente

Le 25/10/15 17:51, Vicente J. Botet Escriba a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> maybe some of you have already see the Howard Hinnant presentation at 
> CppCOn2015 [1] about his new data-v2 library [2]. My prototype of 
> Boost.Chrono/Date library ([3] ] was based on the Howard original 
> library, but when we want to reach the maximum of performances we need 
> to use a specific date class for each usage. This is what Howard 
> explains in his marvelous presentation ans his tiny date library
>
> My post here wants to know if there is interest in a library providing 
> what H.H. date library provides in Boost.
> Note that his data-v2 library yet doesn't provides as much as 
> Boost.Date provides but IMHO it is much elegant and efficient. If 
> there is enough interest, I will request you to do a first review of 
> the H.H. Date-V2 library.
> Then once we have a consensus I will make my POC Chrono/Date library 
> ready for review.
>
> H.H. Date-V2 is under MIT license, which IIRC is compatible with the 
> Boost license. I don't know yet if would need to add this license, as 
> my POC [3] is already a good starting point, nevertheless, I would 
> like to know if there could be any issues about having the source 
> under both licenses.
>
> Best,
> Vicente
>
>
>
> [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzyGjOm8AKo
> [2] https://github.com/HowardHinnant/date
> [3] https://github.com/viboes/chrono_date/commits/master
> First commit Nov/2011 Last-Mars2014
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: 
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>