Subject: Re: [boost] Interest in a Boost.Chrono/Date library
From: Ion GaztaÃ±aga (igaztanaga_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-11-01 18:42:26
On 01/11/2015 19:08, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
> Hi again,
> from the number of replays to this post and the number of informal
> review received I deduce that there is not enough interest in this library.
> Maybe next time will be a better :)
I think there is interest. The license issue is the main question.
Although I guess that using Howard's detailed articles we could rewrite
the library with much bigger effort.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk