Re: [boost] Status of the CMake-ification

Subject: Re: [boost] Status of the CMake-ification
From: Domagoj Saric (dsaritz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-11-17 03:47:46

On 17.11.2015. 6:01, Robert Ramey wrote:
> There's no reason you can't do it for your own library.
<...>
>
> On the other hand, boost build does somethings that CMake can't do.

Such as (an honest question)?

 > So
> making a CMake file doesn't get one off the hook for making the bjam file.

FWIW I'd like a CMake-ified Boost primarily from the perspective of a 
library developer (since as much as I like Boost I 'hate' 
bbuild...having to learn and use it only because of Boost is, for me, a 
serious put-off factor from contributing)...

-- 
"What Huxley teaches is that in the age of advanced technology, 
spiritual devastation is more likely to come from an enemy with a 
smiling face than from one whose countenance exudes suspicion and hate."
Neil Postman