Subject: Re: [boost] Status of the CMake-ification
From: Domagoj Saric (dsaritz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-11-17 03:47:46
On 17.11.2015. 6:01, Robert Ramey wrote:
> There's no reason you can't do it for your own library.
> On the other hand, boost build does somethings that CMake can't do.
Such as (an honest question)?
> making a CMake file doesn't get one off the hook for making the bjam file.
FWIW I'd like a CMake-ified Boost primarily from the perspective of a
library developer (since as much as I like Boost I 'hate'
bbuild...having to learn and use it only because of Boost is, for me, a
serious put-off factor from contributing)...
-- "What Huxley teaches is that in the age of advanced technology, spiritual devastation is more likely to come from an enemy with a smiling face than from one whose countenance exudes suspicion and hate." Neil Postman
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk