Subject: Re: [boost] Status of the CMake-ification
From: Stephen Kelly (hello_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-11-19 15:42:12
Louis Dionne wrote:
> Thanks to everybody for the comments. I, for one, think that a first step
> be achieved by providing a CMake build system for new libraries, and
> slowly porting old libraries to CMake (without removing the old
> Boost.Build, of course). One thing that I also find useful is to provide a
> FindXXX.cmake module for my library, so it can be used as an external
> dependency to any CMake-based project quite easily.
That's the wrong thing to do. Provide XXXConfig.cmake instead. See my other
mail in this thread for more.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk