Re: [boost] [fiber] ready for next review

Subject: Re: [boost] [fiber] ready for next review
From: Agustín K-ballo Bergé (kaballo86_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-12-05 09:08:33

On 12/4/2015 11:48 AM, Agustín K-ballo Bergé wrote:
> On 12/4/2015 4:47 AM, Oliver Kowalke wrote:
>> 2015-12-03 22:21 GMT+01:00 Agustín K-ballo Bergé <kaballo86_at_[hidden]>:
>>
>>> Yes, in the documentation.
>>
>>
>> documentation might need some updates - my announcement was primarly
>> focused to the source code
>
> Fair enough, I was misguided by the "ready for next review" subject as
> well as the announcement that requests from the review have been
> addressed. This is obviously not the case, but we can still make a lot
> of progress based on source code adjustments only.
 >
>> * addressed:
>> - re-factoring of future<> and related classes

I assume this ^ refers to the following piece of feedback: 
http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2015/09/225289.php

The refactoring does not appear to have happened for `promise`. Is this 
intentional, or just an oversight?

In the futures, `wait_for` and `wait_until` stand out as they have been 
defined to forward to base instead of simply using `using`. Is there a 
reason for that?

Regards,
-- 
Agustín K-ballo Bergé.-
http://talesofcpp.fusionfenix.com