Subject: Re: [boost] [fiber] ready for next review
From: Oliver Kowalke (oliver.kowalke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-12-05 10:07:48
2015-12-05 15:08 GMT+01:00 AgustÃn K-ballo BergÃ© <kaballo86_at_[hidden]>:
The refactoring does not appear to have happened for `promise`. Is this
> intentional, or just an oversight?
> In the futures, `wait_for` and `wait_until` stand out as they have been
> defined to forward to base instead of simply using `using`. Is there a
> reason for that?
a false usage of directive usage together with templated member functions -
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk