Re: [boost] [fiber] ready for next review

Subject: Re: [boost] [fiber] ready for next review
From: Oliver Kowalke (oliver.kowalke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-12-05 10:07:48

2015-12-05 15:08 GMT+01:00 Agustín K-ballo Bergé <kaballo86_at_[hidden]>:

The refactoring does not appear to have happened for `promise`. Is this
> intentional, or just an oversight?
>

oversight

> In the futures, `wait_for` and `wait_until` stand out as they have been
> defined to forward to base instead of simply using `using`. Is there a
> reason for that?
>

a false usage of directive usage together with templated member functions -
fixed