Subject: Re: [boost] ATTENTION: Library requirements..
From: AgustÃn K-ballo BergÃ© (kaballo86_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-01-07 07:40:44
On 1/7/2016 7:53 AM, Louis Dionne wrote:
> Robert Ramey <ramey <at> rrsd.com> writes:
>> A few observations
>> f) javescript.
>> I thing the admonitions agains java script should be softened. Most of
>> the concerns existent when the document was originally written don't
>> apply to day. I would like to see our html documentation support thinks
>> like syntax coloring, running example code online, and the like. These
> performance benchmarks to the documentation in a nice way.
mind its use when it results in a superior documentation, as long as
it's optional and I can still get at least a mediocre documentation with
the basic information, and possibly some hint that I need to enable
> as being outdated.
That might address one of the reasons given for banning it, namely:
- Incompatible with some older browsers and some text based browsers.
What's your take on the remaining ones?
- Makes printing docs pages difficult.
- Often results in really bad user interface design.
- "It's just annoying in general."
- Makes docs maintenance by other than the original developer more
-- Agustín K-ballo Bergé.- http://talesofcpp.fusionfenix.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk