Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Evolution
From: Paul Fultz II (pfultz2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-05-17 23:49:10
> On May 17, 2016, at 9:52 PM, Vladimir Batov <Vladimir.Batov_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 05/18/2016 12:33 PM, David Sankel wrote:
>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Vladimir Batov <
>> Vladimir.Batov_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> More so. If one tries to search for "C++ Boost" (as Robert suggested) and for "Boost software" as you David suggested you'll immediately see that people by far prefer Robert's (I do).
>> Yes, people prefer c+boost over even C++! (
>> If you move your mouse over the results, you'll see that "C+boost" was what
>> the system looked for. When you type in "boost" in the search box you'll
>> get the "Software" grouping disambiguator. cmake doesn't need a
>> disambiguator. The original graph is a good reflection of reality.
> Thank you for pointing it out. Indeed, the pop-up box does show "C+boost". Still, the "Search term" box shows "C++ Boost". You seem to outright dismiss the information provided by the "Search term" box and to present the pop-up box info as the sole truth. I am far from convinced it's justified. In fact, the "q=C%2B%2B" seems to indicate that it indeed searched for C++.
> > When you type in "boost" in the search box you'll get the "Software" grouping disambiguator.
> You seem to trust that filtering component working flawlessly. I am again not that sure. :-)
> More so, the numbers shown in that pop-up box are questionable... not to say outright bogus. :-)
The top queries for boost software(as David suggested) show things like âboost threadâ or âboost pythonâ, which seem to be very relevant search queries, however, the âC++ boostâ search show top queries like âvitamin Câ or âhepatitis Câ which is completely off track.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk