Subject: Re: [boost] doctest - the lightest feature rich C++ single header testing framework - if it can enter boost and if it/boost will benefit from that
From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-05-23 05:35:20
Viktor Kirilov <vik.kirilov <at> gmail.com> writes:
> I just released doctest - https://github.com/onqtam/doctest
Why is this called doctest? Are you testing documentation? Or doctors ;)
> All the info about it can be found on github.
> So do you think it can enter the boost project?
Not that I am trying to discourage your efforts, but can you list advantages of
this framework over other existing framework in boost: Boost.Test or
lightweight_test? Also can you list features you do not support to make it
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk