Subject: Re: [boost] doctest - the lightest feature rich C++ single header testing framework - if it can enter boost and if it/boost will benefit from that
From: Gavin Lambert (gavinl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-05-23 19:30:06
On 23/05/2016 21:35, Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
> Why is this called doctest? Are you testing documentation? Or doctors ;)
Presumably it's from the premise that "tests are documentation, so they
should sit next to the production code" (paraphrased).
Which I'm not particularly convinced by, as covered elsewhere.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk