Subject: Re: [boost] (Boost) Synapse update
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-09-26 20:01:44
On 9/26/2016 7:25 PM, Emil Dotchevski wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Edward Diener <eldiener_at_[hidden]>
>> On 9/26/2016 3:46 PM, Emil Dotchevski wrote:
>>> (Synapse is not part of Boost. I appreciate feedback as well as looking
>>> someone willing to volunteer as review manager when Synapse is submitted
>>> for formal review.)
>> I am willing to be the review manager for Synapse.
>> I think highly of Synapse and feel that you can ask that it be put on the
>> review queue, even if you are still adding some features as you specify
> Sounds good. As for features, I prefer to have actual use cases before new
> features are implemented. Until this point the only thing that I personally
> had been missing was the ability to communicate with signals across
> different threads, which I have now implemented.
OK. I think you can ask that Synapse go on the review queue and have a
date set for review. I don't think you should have to wait for feedback
and use cases which might introduce changes to do that. Of course it is
up to you if you want to wait for further input.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk