Subject: Re: [boost] Extending Boost.Python with NumPy support
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-10-04 05:22:06
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boost [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Stefan Seefeld
> Sent: 03 October 2016 21:27
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] Extending Boost.Python with NumPy support
> On 03.10.2016 08:13, Rob Stewart wrote:
> > On October 2, 2016 6:20:27 PM EDT, Stefan Seefeld <stefan_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >> Right, I know that text (being the Boost.Python maintainer) :-)
> >> I'm fully confident concerning the new code's quality. What makes me
> >> wonder
> >> (and triggered my mail) is that the change in its current form will
> >> introduce
> >> * a new library (boost_numpy)
> > How is a new library part of Boost.Python? It seems a review is needed for that.
> Conceptually it's not a new library. It's the result of some refactoring/extension of Boost.Python.
To me, it sounds like maintenance (after discussions) not requiring a review.
If anyone really doesn't like it, they can always shout on the Boost Lists?
--- Paul A. Bristow Prizet Farmhouse Kendal UK LA8 8AB +44 (0) 1539 561830
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk