Re: [boost] [gsoc2017]Satyam Pandey Copy GSoC 2017 Proposal writen by Ruoyun Jing

Subject: Re: [boost] [gsoc2017]Satyam Pandey Copy GSoC 2017 Proposal writen by Ruoyun Jing
From: Ruoyun Jing (jingry0321_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-04-03 11:05:09

*plagiarism is plagiarism, regardless project, and stop acting like a 3
years old!*

2017-04-03 18:57 GMT+08:00 Satyam Pandey <satyampandey0009_at_[hidden]>:

> Hello Ruoyun,
> Sorry,I m not good with Chinese names So, I used he. I'm not acting as 3
> year old but I think you are, using your idea in writing proposal by taking
> a reference is very popular and  is always encouraged. If you believe the
> ideas that you get are so unique that no one else can think it by
> themselves. You could have send your proposal personally to them.
> And you know you have given even the edit accesses  on your doc, please
> remove it else someone can mess up with your doc. I wrote my proposal by
> myself according to me, so it will be better if you can leave it upto
> mentors to decide whether I copied or not.
>

*reference implies quotation or citation of your original work, which in
this topic, was neither. as the resemblance between two proposals is simple
too obvious to consider anything other than full copy of the origin *

> On Apr 3, 2017 4:16 PM, "Ruoyun Jing" <jingry0321_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> plagiarism is plagiarism, regardless project, and stop acting like a 3
>> years old
>>
>> 2017-04-03 18:41 GMT+08:00 Ruoyun Jing <jingry0321_at_[hidden]>:
>>
>>> “She” please.
>>>
>>> 2017-04-03 18:33 GMT+08:00 Satyam Pandey <satyampandey0009_at_[hidden]>:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I don't know why Ryoung is so fixated on the matter ? The comment that
>>>> I made in his doc was an accident, so I removed it .That's why he got such
>>>> mail later.
>>>> * Secondly, We are applying for "different projects "  . Copying his
>>>> exact proposal will not even make sense for me.*
>>>> What I used was his style of writing with some other older proposal . I
>>>> am adding them as reference here too.
>>>> I really feel this is too frustrating why this guy don't even
>>>> understand that we are doing 2 different projects, so I can't copy him .
>>>> And Sorry to tell you, I used  used Moss on our proposal and  there is less
>>>> than 10% match is our proposal, if you claim that I have just changed a few
>>>> words come with some proof as moss is telling something different.
>>>>
>>>> Please someone look into it. It is very irritating.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Satyam Pandey
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 3, 2017 3:37 PM, "Ruoyun Jing via Boost" <boost_at_[hidden]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Boost, Vissarion, Adam,  Niall, David
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for disturbing you at this time, I experienced a very bad thing
>>>> that
>>>> Satyam Pandey, a student who sent proposal yesterday copied too many
>>>> sections of my proposal. I marked the sections red in the given PDF.* I
>>>> think the same pattern of GSoC proposal is common, and it does not
>>>> matter,
>>>> but his proposal has too many same description as me. *
>>>>
>>>> And I received two emails from google docs. I will transmit these two
>>>> emails in the following emailsThe meaning of one email is Satyam Pandey
>>>> do
>>>> a replace:replace “Dev Environment Visual Studio for C# development
>>>> Eclipse
>>>> for JAVA development Code Blocks, Sublime T…”  to“`+”
>>>>
>>>> The meaning of another email is Satyam Pandey reject the comment of
>>>> "Proposal" from his own, replace “Dev Environment Visual Studio for C#
>>>> development Eclipse for JAVA development Code Blocks, Sublime T…”
>>>> to“`+”
>>>>
>>>> I sent an email to him, but he did not think he did the copy work. But
>>>> the
>>>> actually thing is* he forked the whole proposal and then change some
>>>> words
>>>> to fix his condition.*
>>>>
>>>> 2017-04-03 7:42 GMT+08:00 Satyam Pandey <satyampandey0009_at_[hidden]>:
>>>>
>>>> > Hello Ruyong,
>>>> > I just wanted to explain my part here. I did not copy as per what I
>>>> > understand.I have tried answering your queries.I hope you will read it
>>>> > calmly and would try to understand.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >    1. As far as I could guess we share similar background of
>>>> competitive
>>>> >    programming and have no experience in contributing to any large
>>>> orgs . So I
>>>> >    used your proposal as reference for writing my proposal.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >    1. Our Programming interest are same cause they are, I will end it
>>>> >    here. This cannot be called a copy-case because thats-what I feel
>>>> are the
>>>> >    things that I like. How can you question that? Every guy that
>>>> loves maths
>>>> >    and programming would have written it in the same way and I'm not
>>>> faking my
>>>> >    interest toward them as  you can check by following the links that
>>>> I have
>>>> >    given about different contest that I have participated in. Or do
>>>> you want
>>>> >    to say no-one other than you can like both.
>>>> >    2. The Timeline was, one feature that I liked in your proposal, so
>>>> I
>>>> >    used it. How its copying ? Your exact timeline will not even make
>>>> sense for
>>>> >    me,cause we are applying for different Projects.
>>>> >    3. And I did not understood "And you did not code for programming
>>>> >    competency test, but have the same idea of implement of test" .
>>>> What
>>>> >    does this mean ? . Firstly I haven't read your proposal after you
>>>> start
>>>> >    describing "*far enough*" . So ,I did not know what you were doing
>>>> in
>>>> >    your test. Even if I knew what you have done or written there, do
>>>> you
>>>> >    think, you have claimed that way of solving the problem by putting
>>>> it in
>>>> >    your proposal ? And even after reading your proficiency test idea,
>>>> the
>>>> >    only thing that matches with my idea is the Basic-Distance
>>>> function which
>>>> >    is the first result that we get after googling the problem ? So ,
>>>> have we
>>>> >    both copied from google ??
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > I do not think this means reference, he just use my discription
>>>> directly
>>>> and change some similar words.* This means COPY. *
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > And please before going public with this, you could have at-least
>>>> talked
>>>> > to me personally. I don't think Boost-Developer mailing list is meant
>>>> for
>>>> > such discussions. Mailing list are made for communication that
>>>> concerns the
>>>> > whole org not any individual. You could have directly mailed to me,
>>>> before
>>>> > creating this nuisance.
>>>> > Genuinely you should be happy that people are following your style
>>>> and if
>>>> > not, at least think a little before calling someone cheat because
>>>> borrowing
>>>> > ideas are not equivalent to cheating , in anyway.
>>>> >
>>>> > I apologize to all for spamming their mail-boxes
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> *I do not accept his apologize. I want to be given impartial judgement
>>>> for
>>>> this disgusting COPY.*
>>>>
>>>> Thanks all for reading.:)
>>>>
>>>> Best regards.
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman
>>>> /listinfo.cgi/boost
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Northwest University of China
>>> Software Engineering
>>> jingry0321_at_[hidden] <jingry0321_at_[hidden]>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Northwest University of China
>> Software Engineering
>> jingry0321_at_[hidden] <jingry0321_at_[hidden]>
>>
>

-- 
Northwest University of China
Software Engineering
jingry0321_at_[hidden] <jingry0321_at_[hidden]>