Re: [boost] [gsoc2017]Satyam Pandey Copy GSoC 2017 Proposal writen by Ruoyun Jing

Subject: Re: [boost] [gsoc2017]Satyam Pandey Copy GSoC 2017 Proposal writen by Ruoyun Jing
From: Ruoyun Jing (jingry0321_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-04-03 11:06:46

*NO ! I REJECT !*
*Plagiarism is plagiarism!*

2017-04-03 19:04 GMT+08:00 Satyam Pandey <satyampandey0009_at_[hidden]>:

> Sorry for using such harsh words earlier. I'm little frustrated now, I
> really want to work in this project and I did not start earlier so , I have
> to complete everything in a hurry. As yours and mine background was very
> similar (professionally (i.e we do competitive and all)). I used your
> proposal  as a reference for preparing mine. I would have really thanked
> you if you would have helped me to make my proposal better as anyhow we are
> working on different projects, so it does not matter even if our proposal
> have some similarity. We could have helped each other rather than making
> all this mess.
>
> Thanks
> Satyam Pandey
>
>
> On Apr 3, 2017 3:37 PM, "Ruoyun Jing via Boost" <boost_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Boost, Vissarion, Adam,  Niall, David
>
> Sorry for disturbing you at this time, I experienced a very bad thing that
> Satyam Pandey, a student who sent proposal yesterday copied too many
> sections of my proposal. I marked the sections red in the given PDF.* I
> think the same pattern of GSoC proposal is common, and it does not matter,
> but his proposal has too many same description as me. *
>
> And I received two emails from google docs. I will transmit these two
> emails in the following emailsThe meaning of one email is Satyam Pandey do
> a replace:replace “Dev Environment Visual Studio for C# development Eclipse
> for JAVA development Code Blocks, Sublime T…”  to“`+”
>
> The meaning of another email is Satyam Pandey reject the comment of
> "Proposal" from his own, replace “Dev Environment Visual Studio for C#
> development Eclipse for JAVA development Code Blocks, Sublime T…”  to“`+”
>
> I sent an email to him, but he did not think he did the copy work. But the
> actually thing is* he forked the whole proposal and then change some words
> to fix his condition.*
>
> 2017-04-03 7:42 GMT+08:00 Satyam Pandey <satyampandey0009_at_[hidden]>:
>
> > Hello Ruyong,
> > I just wanted to explain my part here. I did not copy as per what I
> > understand.I have tried answering your queries.I hope you will read it
> > calmly and would try to understand.
> >
> >
> >    1. As far as I could guess we share similar background of competitive
> >    programming and have no experience in contributing to any large orgs
> . So I
> >    used your proposal as reference for writing my proposal.
> >
> >
> >    1. Our Programming interest are same cause they are, I will end it
> >    here. This cannot be called a copy-case because thats-what I feel are
> the
> >    things that I like. How can you question that? Every guy that loves
> maths
> >    and programming would have written it in the same way and I'm not
> faking my
> >    interest toward them as  you can check by following the links that I
> have
> >    given about different contest that I have participated in. Or do you
> want
> >    to say no-one other than you can like both.
> >    2. The Timeline was, one feature that I liked in your proposal, so I
> >    used it. How its copying ? Your exact timeline will not even make
> sense for
> >    me,cause we are applying for different Projects.
> >    3. And I did not understood "And you did not code for programming
> >    competency test, but have the same idea of implement of test" . What
> >    does this mean ? . Firstly I haven't read your proposal after you
> start
> >    describing "*far enough*" . So ,I did not know what you were doing in
> >    your test. Even if I knew what you have done or written there, do you
> >    think, you have claimed that way of solving the problem by putting it
> in
> >    your proposal ? And even after reading your proficiency test idea, the
> >    only thing that matches with my idea is the Basic-Distance function
> which
> >    is the first result that we get after googling the problem ? So ,
> have we
> >    both copied from google ??
> >
> >
> > I do not think this means reference, he just use my discription directly
> and change some similar words.* This means COPY. *
>
>
> > And please before going public with this, you could have at-least talked
> > to me personally. I don't think Boost-Developer mailing list is meant for
> > such discussions. Mailing list are made for communication that concerns
> the
> > whole org not any individual. You could have directly mailed to me,
> before
> > creating this nuisance.
> > Genuinely you should be happy that people are following your style and if
> > not, at least think a little before calling someone cheat because
> borrowing
> > ideas are not equivalent to cheating , in anyway.
> >
> > I apologize to all for spamming their mail-boxes
> >
>
> *I do not accept his apologize. I want to be given impartial judgement for
> this disgusting COPY.*
>
> Thanks all for reading.:)
>
> Best regards.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman
> /listinfo.cgi/boost
>
>
>

-- 
Northwest University of China
Software Engineering
jingry0321_at_[hidden] <jingry0321_at_[hidden]>